Saturday, November 10, 2018



In welding shop, with sexy hoe

Thursday, November 08, 2018

NM-2 One more update

Miracle of miracles, the last 8,000 votes were counted, and put Xochitl Small Torres on top. She beat Yvette Harrell by less than 2000 votes, but more than a razor-thin margin that would require a recount. She won and she's going to Washington.

This will make New Mexico entirely blue, in governor, two senators, and three congresspeople; it makes our congressional delegation the first to be all "people of color."

This sudden turnaround has gone somewhat unnoticed in the press. We found out from the Las Cruces Sun News, and the New York Times picked it up, but it went virtually unnoticed on politico or other sites that we follow. A turn of a seat is usually news, at least on the day it happens, but this wasn't - far overshadowed by the firing of Sessions, etc. The dust settles on the southern desert, and we have a Democratic congressperson, but the world goes on. I haven't heard either of their names mentioned at all today or yesterday.

I find New Mexico to be polite in a genteel, kind of southern way. A lot of the people say "y'all" and they don't call each other by first names for a long time, long after meeting, only with permission, etc., as is an old Hispanic custom. That's why they don't talk politics much. You have to get to know someone; you can't go around disagreeing with each other. It disrupts the harmony and the general rhythm of life.

Their margin was less than 1%, and I think on some level people won't forget. Two more years, and it'll be a whole new game. My own guess is that two more years and we'll be hurting economically; tariffs will have sunk in, and T will be mired in a corrupt and ineffective administration. The battle we are preparing for is the release of Mueller's report, but there will be more; the ever-shifting line, marking the center of American politics, will move one direction or another.

I find it very noteworthy that it landed here, in southern New Mexico, where ranchers share a sparse landscape with old Mexican-American families and an occasional set of young folks who move in for the same reason they've occupied Colorado, Arizona, and Montana. Really the ranchers dominate, but, in our case, we have a thousand mile border and this issue of $45 mil/foot wall. You'd think they'd welcome the jobs, but we don't; New Mexico's senators were the only ones, besides Kamala Harris, who voted against the wall. My own feeling about it is that walls will be outdated with the arrival of drones (which are already here) and since you'll need drone protection anyway, forget the wall and put it all into drones. A wall would be an utter waste of $45 mil/foot.

Or whatever. The price keeps going up, on account of the tariffs.

Wednesday, November 07, 2018

NM-2 update

Our race was very close. A normally very conservative district, the vast majority ranchers, almost flipped blue, but the Democratic candidate, Xochitl Small-Torres, ended up losing barely to Yvette Harrell, Republican, by about 1900 votes. The last I heard, there were a few thousand left to count, all in Dona Ana County, Xochitl's stronghold, but I would think it would be unlikely that they'd count a few thousand, and have them all go to her. I think it's over. And I think you could point to a number of reasons she was unable to flip it.

The first was a merciless television campaign. Harrell got the support of a wealthy national organization that funded television ads for R candidates in crucial districts, and they flooded the airwaves. People in my hometown thought Xochitl would take their guns (not true), that she would do whatever Pelosi says (not true), that she would vote against Social Security (where this came from, I still don't know). Nationally, they had figured out what people's hot buttons were, and pressed them. It was undeniable that she came from a liberal, community activist (water-rights oriented) background, and they pushed that too, as if that were some kind of liability. Most important, the Trump base was energized; they all came out to vote. They were aware of the "blue wave," well afraid of its consequences, and they were all there on election day.

I generalize these reasons, and say, it probably happened all over the country. Record turnout at the polls. Highly motivated voters on both sides. Increasingly contentious and polarized electorate. More money pumped into the propaganda machine than ever. And the Republicans, by and large, are better at that than the Dems.

Frankly, I thought that Hispanic turnout would be more than it was. We live on the border, with a huge population of Hispanics in every county, particularly in the towns, like Roswell, Alamogordo, Carlsbad, and Socorro, but also in the smaller places along the border and over by the bootheel. the eastern part of the state has seen an oil boom, in places like Artesia, Hobbs, and Jal, and those towns are very conservative, I assume because they believe Trump is good for the industry. It's not clear to me whether there was record turnout in the oil districts, or, if increased Hispanic turnout would be good for the Dems; a surprising number of Hispanics are very conservative, and abandoned the Dems a few years back. I'm still studying the results in this area.

Nationally, I have few things to be happy about. I'm glad Scott Walker is out of there. The Iowa Nazi won another term but Iowa itself shifted more to the blue. A congressman I detest in my home district of Illinois won one more time. This time the Green influence hardly mattered. An interesting local race saw the candidacy of Gary Johnson, Libertarian, not make much difference. He got maybe 20% of the vote, and one could argue that most of it came from the red side, but the reds lost by about thirty anyway, so I don't think they're too mad at him. Most of New Mexico has gone blue, and the big news in the far west is that Arizona, Nevada, and even Montana are going that direction as well. It's a new dawn, with only Utah and Texas still staunchly in the red column, and it's possible to question even Texas. Things can happen, and it might be interesting in 2020.

Thursday, November 01, 2018

Rise of Nazism II

I know two people who fell for the general resurgence of white nationalism as represented by the swastika, or the general blaming of Jews for problems of the white culture, or the nation, in this case the USA. I should say that there are plenty of white nationalists who are not Nazis, i.e. don't specifically blame Jews for everything, yet still attracted to the rigid order presented by a guy like Trump. There are also people who blame Jews for everything, i.e. Palestinians and Palestinian supporters, who are not so rigid in their idea of how a government should look, but who are simply anti-Zionist or firmly against the Israeli state.

But these two acquaintances give some idea of why we occasionally see the swastika these days: underground, of course, but spreading like a disease. You want to bring back Hitler? Simply kill people that aren't like you? That idea is not as unacceptable as it used to be. It's possible to say and think all kinds of stuff.

The first swastika I saw was on the site of a distant relative. He's white, uneducated, in sorry shape; in short, a kind of person who has fallen out of the system as we know it, with not much chance of making it. I don't know him well, not at all in fact, but that's all I know about him. How could he put that on his site? It was on a knife, as part of a picture of his dinner, but the message was clear: he's reaching for the times of Hitler. He's not ashamed to show that, or let us know.

The second is a guy I knew through Quakerism. He was a more complex case; he had joined the army, come back, sought out Buddhism and Quakerism both as ways to curtail the rage inside him. Who was he mad at? In the end he blamed the Jews. He just took on this whole conspiracy idea, that there are Jews among us, who want us to fall into decadence and dissension, who are behind everything from gay marriage (control of Hollywood) to the Democratic Party (George Soros, or whoever). I find this kind of thing unacceptable, but I kept him on my facebook; facebook itself would remove him occasionally, as he would forward things that were blatantly race-baiting, provocative, and untrue. He seemed to be attracted to the idea that the culture was crumbling, and something within it was at fault. That to be strong, and survive, we must seek our own tribe of like others.

White nationalism takes a different form in Europe, where each country has a distinct white identity, separate from the others, and takes measures to limit the degree that that identity can be compromised racially. In the US it's always been more of an open question; this place wasn't white originally, and was established on the idea that others could come here, as we, the white Europeans did. So there's a much more realistic chance that the white majority will cease to be a majority, and whites are seeing their majority slip away at every turn. Thus the popularity of a guy like Trump, who, in spite of his corruption and every other problem, turns around and curses the caravan, or even pays the caravan to keep walking, so he can win re-election. He stokes the white nationalist flames, and can't even say anything bad about a guy who walks into a temple and shoots people. He won't rally the country against white nationalism, or its rise, as he represents it, in a very direct way. He doesn't wear the swastika. But it doesn't matter; everyone knows what he represents.

Wednesday, October 31, 2018

weblogs as a network

All these years, I've been using these weblogs. One reason I keep using them is that they are useful to me, in organizing my thoughts, in getting ready for a writing project, etc. Late at night, I'm tired, I want to write but am drained of creativity, I'll write on my personal weblog. I do something professional, and want to keep track of it, I put it here; this is where I keep track of various language-related interests. Recently I've gotten more alarmed about the downfall of the country, and I've put that here too.

They had another purpose, though, and that was to sell my books, or put my name out there. This has not worked. Or at least, it hasn't sold any books to speak of. It could be that you have to have thousands and thousands of views before people actually click on "buy," but in any case, they haven't made it to the last step; maybe I'm a crappy writer. Or it could be that weblogs tend to be a backwater of the web, and, if you don't keep "refreshing" them, they get even more so. Why should Google put them up on the search pages?

In the publishing business, I have another weakness; I publish only on Amazon, and have not really sought out other venues or ways to sell things. Amazon has millions of titles, and mine, selling as little as they do, are way down in the vast uncharted bottom of the sea. I thought I could use these weblogs to advertise a little, but here I have two new releases on Audible; I have a facebook page, an Amazon page and a Twitter, and still, I'm in some backwater. Either I'm a sucky writer, and everyone's figured that out, or, you have to pay some real money to get real people to see you. I don't know, really. My son has a YouTube channel; he makes plenty of money; I'm jealous, and still, I sit over here wondering if I'll ever get "discovered." It could be that I have only my own stubbornness to blame. Or it could be, I should just be more of an instagram poet.

But meanwhile, the weblogs have a steady trickle of traffic. My personal one leads (1094 visits/mo.), followed by this one (943), and the link-haiku e pluribus haiku (489). Music (363) and poetry (341) follow. Five more are over a hundred: boxcars (268), quakers (269), lubbock (247), ESL closet (216) and folk tales (169). I don't know if being over a hundred qualifies for anything. My sense is that maybe I have to push a little to get them to go anywhere.

They get stale; I go months, or even years, and don't touch them. When I get back up there I see an e pluribus haiku ad, outdated, maybe six or seven years old even. I don't have a regular system for updating them, and as a result, they get kind of ignored in the shuffle. I was looking through them in doing this research, and there was one I'd forgotten I had.

When I'm on my own, I do them mostly for my own gratification. If all they do is represent my current interests, or in the case of my personal weblog, my current rambling thoughts, love for family, nostalgia, etc., then at least it's all here, uploaded, and when the computer crashes, it's still here. I'm kind of organized on the blogspot. It's got everything I've thought and done, everything that's important to me. On that level, it doesn't matter if anyone sees them.

On the other hand, if you need 10,000 views to get one "click" or "like" or "buy," then I'd better get going, and in any case, it wouldn't hurt to have a little upgrade.

Tuesday, October 30, 2018

Rise of Nazism

The shooting in Pittsburgh hit close to home, because I used to live in Squirrel Hill, the neighborhood of Pittsburgh where it took place. I lived there only a summer, as I was staying with my brother (who lived there perhaps five or six years), but I remember clearly the people, Jews and others, who called the place home. The rise of Nazism means everyone becomes overly conscious of their identity, racial, biological, clan-associated, or whatever. If you're Jewish, you have to worry about your safety as you attend your temple or synagogue. I would think, if you're Muslim, same. Eventually you'll feel that way even if you go to a concert, or a bus station. Better take stock of the color of your skin, your background, your papers, etc., as somebody's watching and might just haul you off.

I track the rise of Nazism back to 9/11. People were electrified by the attack on the heart of our nation and they began to question whether it was ok to have diversity around, to let people in, to not fortify ourselves better against the scary violent world out there. Let's not confuse Nazism, which I take to mean absolute rule that tends to blame Jews for all our problems, and a more general tribalism, which is not anti-Semitic so much as just pro-white or pro- whatever group you happen to be born into. I see tribalism as taking over much of the world, with the Balkans first, eastern Europe, even central Europe, Brazil - it's a general trend everywhere. It makes people smaller, and makes them tend to close off from everyone they don't consider "one of them." And white folks in the USA are not the only ones guilty of it.

Nazism is a subset of tribalism, one where displaying the swastika is now a symbol of believing in killing Jews, getting rid of non-white people in an area, or preferring absolute rule by an iron-fisted steel-boot authority over the messiness of democracy or working together. We have the guns and the soldiers, we should just maybe use them? I think this underground rise of Nazi symbolism (it's still not considered acceptable to wear swastikas around, yet they have appeared in various places recently) is part of a deeper feeling among white folks that they're losing the ground beneath their feet, that the "white" country that they knew and loved might be slipping away from them. It's driven by fear. And that fear will get worse as Trump goes down: he loses elections, his corruption makes it impossible for him to stay in office, and the wheels of justice move in on him and his.

Trump himself is not overtly fascist, although he's shown contempt for democracy and the mechanisms the Constitution has set up to block absolutism or monarchy. He wants to use an executive order to remove birthright citizenship, but, if any president can by whim remove any law, what will happen with the next President? Or one who is similarly irresponsible on the left? Maybe the "coming out" of swastikas is not his fault, but in the sharp veer toward despotism it is clearly visible in the mirror. After Charlottesville he says, there are good people on both sides. Yes, and all kinds of good people were complicit in the Holocaust that killed seven million. They were ok people, and they sat around and lived their lives, and said nothing, and the smell of furnaces was right across the valley.

Wednesday, July 18, 2018

High drama in NM-02

I can't really be quiet on this much longer. As a teacher, I try to keep my politics out of the classroom, and avoid antagonizing conservatives, parents, or whoever. They have a right to their views, so I teach only the facts, things they can't argue with. I teach what I'm supposed to, and avoid saying things like "Trump is a crook" or "Trump has sold out the country."

But, Trump is a crook, and Trump is busy selling out the country as fast as he can, before the law catches up to him. His corruption is blatant, as if he knows his time is limited. And, though he will be gone soon, the wreckage will last for years, and those who have allowed for him for so long will have to pay.

That's where NM02 becomes an interesting part of the picture. It has been represented by S.P., a very aggressive old-school conservative. I can guess that S.P. is quite uncomfortable that Trump sold out to the Russians, follows Putin's orders, etc. He doesn't seem to mind that Trump sells out the public lands, or dismantles the public schools, or various other things. Some conservatives are ok with much of Trump's agenda and they always start with the Supreme Court as if violating the law to get conservatives up there is something to be proud of. But, Pearce has his eye on the New Mexico governorship and is vacating his seat; it is being contested by Yvette Herrell, Republican, and Xochitl Torres-Small, Democrat.

NM-02 is a traditionally conservative district. It covers more than half of the state, going all the way up as far north as Albuquerque, to the east, west and central, and most of that is ranch country. The ranchers vote at a high rate and generally vote conservative. In the bootheel (far southwestern NM) they voted for Obama but this time around voted for Trump, possibly because of concerns about the porous border. The cities in the district are all small: Las Cruces (now over 100,000, by far the most liberal), Roswell, Alamogordo, Socorro, Carlsbad. It doesn't take long before you're talking really small towns, places nobody's ever heard of. These towns would be overwhelmingly Democrat if everyone voted, but they don't. My town, Alamogordo, whites are a distinct minority in the schools, and most of the kids' parents are residents, citizens. I doubt they vote, or that most of them vote. They're busy making a living.

NM-02 is considered by some "leaning R" but by one "likely R." People at the national level are analyzing this stuff, and possibly allocating resources where it could make a difference. If so, this is one place where it could. I would say that any Hispanic who would still vote Republican, or vote to continue to approve and allow the kind of things Trump is pushing, is definitely not paying attention. And if the rest of the Hispanic vote would simply register and vote, it could swing this thing.

I started a Facebook page and a twitter account to target the legions of young New Mexicans who have so far not been mad enough to vote. These are non-partisan: if you are telling everyone to vote, you are not blatantly on one side or the other. I think, in this part of New Mexico, it's a pretty-much Democrat thing to do, since there are thousands of young Democrats out there, whereas there are what, a few young ranchers who are probably already registered. Nevertheless I ought to be able to go just about anywhere with these two sites, and say, vote vote vote (or vota vota vota) in any crowd, and not feel like I'm making people mad in this partisan world.

My problem is that I'm finding it hard to keep quiet about the other stuff. It feels so good to release my anger, to actually do something about the situation, that, once started, I can't very well stop. My message really is, this clown is crooked, evil and temporary, but the shame of those who have allowed it to continue must be dealt with. And it must be dealt with on a local level. We need to get these clowns out of there. Sure, they were in a tough position. They felt like they had to support him because that's what their constituents wanted. So now what, they have to stand by while he sells out all the nation's resources, follows Putin's wishes, sells out the free press? They can stand by, but I won't stand by.