Thursday, July 09, 2020

Annals of Public Education IV

It's a new day, one in which your public school might not be safe. It is not their fault. I love the public schools, especially ours here in this village, but sometimes one has to face the facts.

I have raised ten children, and am down to the last three, who are 12, 14 and 15. The public schools have treated them and the other seven very well over the years; I have no complaint. The last few years of my teaching career I was a substitute in a nearby town and got a close look at public education and all its problems. One of them is that we have come to rely on them for moral education and abuse prevention, but that's not their fault either. In order to keep people safe, they instituted some procedures (if you have a fever, go home and stay home for 24 hours) and parents just had to live with those procedures. They instituted other procedures that protected students from the fact that society is armed to the teeth and there is virtually no way to keep an armed shooter out of the school under most circumstances.

But I digress. The present situation, where Trump/DeVos say "Go back to school" and the health experts say, "that's not safe!" or "you have to do x y & z before it's safe" places a burden on the schools that they will collapse under. You don't catch Trump/DeVos saying "We want your children to have the best education possible," and that's because they are not motivated by that, or don't care about that, or simply have other priorities. So, the bottom line is, if you want your kids (and yourself, by extension) to be safe, and you want them to have a good education, you're on your own.

The people who survive this pandemic are going to be the ones who take care of their families, by keeping them safe, and avoid public gatherings with enclosed ventilation systems. You cannot keep an asymptomatic transmitter out of a school building because, unlike the AK-47, you can't see the covid. You can see the AK-47, and you still can't keep it out of the building. Parents who are smart will work on other systems fast, and should have two goals: keep your kids safe, and, give them a good education.

I have two pieces of good information. One is that zoom works. The other is that the one-room schoolhouse model works, too. Both will take a lot of adjustment and fine-tuning before they work well.

It's the boys who hate zoom the most. I have one who doesn't do so well on zoom. He also wouldn't do so well on parent-child home schooling. The school has done a pretty good job with him and I would love to send him back to school. There is no way he could stay six feet from everyone and wear a mask. I will be the first to admit we have become soft about that kind of discipline, where a kid will actually sit still in an isolated chair and just do his work when he has to. But I know it can be done, because I've seen it. I know zoom can work, because I've seen that too.

I've spent the lockdown studying my pioneer ancestors. They learned about twenty times as much stuff (logic, Latin, geography, grammar, etc.) in about a twentieth of the time we spend, and here we are, sitting around arguing about whether it's worthwhile to teach cursive in what little time we have. We are down to the bare bones in mathematics, and it's because people don't understand "exponential growth" (particularly Trump, DeVos, & friends, and those who elected them), that we're in the pickle we're in. So we've had a number of problems with the system as it is, for many years, and that won't change. Even if we elect a Democrat immediately, it will take years to rebuild and the damage will be immeasurable in the meantime.

The pioneers followed several simple rules: Keep the kids busy so that they value education in the two winter weeks when they are snowed in and actually have time to engage in it. Second, get neighbors and bind together, so you get the best of collective skills of the community and you have a reasonable set of goals to set up when they are learning; and, third, cut your losses if you have to; if they refuse to learn, let them go out and work, or, let them live with their own consequences. A single room with all twelve grades will work, and kids will learn how to chop wood, winterize, etc. in the process of taking care of their own site. The older will teach the younger. The community will all become more involved and notice what is being learned and taught.

So, to the question of "What should a single parent do?"(in the present situation) I would answer: Start here. If school is unsafe, you need to find another way. Find family to supervise. Find a community to share schooling. Find some way to educate your kid and be safe. A kid can lose a few weeks while you get organized. But the covid is not going anywhere; on the contrary, it's getting worse. Your #1 priority is surviving, and education is right up there: you need to find the best way to educate your kid in difficult circumstances.

To those who are concerned about abuse, I would answer: That wasn't the school's job in the first place. A community and family should watch out for its abused kids, yes. If the government has to step in and remove abused kids from their home, ok. But relying on the school to make sure that happened was probably a mistake to begin with anyway. Stop worrying about how those kids will get by. If you know some, worry about them; get involved, do what you can. But don't use that as an excuse to prop up a school that can no longer do its job. The school is not a social service agency whose job it is to check on the welfare of every kid in a community every day. A school is a resource for learning and knowing what kids can learn at each level - and that's how we should use it.

There is one more possibility which I have been advocating for years. A large system of schooling + daycare, free for all parents, which would ensure that every kid is both safe and educated, would allow all parents to work, and would save a bundle in welfare payments for those parents who presently stay home because they have to care for their kids. This would be enormously expensive, though, and would have to be organized carefully. If the government is forcing people to go back to school without regard for safety and without stating that they care about the quality of the education, that doesn't bode well for enlarging the system and making sure that all kids are safe and well-educated, and fed, and given moral supervision, all year round. If people had simply aligned themselves behind Bernie we could have been talking about that, but Bernie couldn't even win the majority of Democrats, so I don't really believe this society is ready for it.

In order to start or run anything, we need a collective agreement. Almost a third of this country doesn't care what happens to the schools, and even the Congress didn't prevent DeVos from getting in there and dismantling them. It's we, the people, who are going to have to stand up for the education of our own children, in order to prevent this country from going down under the weight of the sheer ignorance that lack of education has engendered. We've had enough of that, even before this covid cleared out everyone who couldn't stay out of harm's way. And the covid is just getting started. I was a math teacher, and I know a little about exponential growth. Stay home and take care of yourself; it's getting worse, and we're in for a rough ride.

I want to make one more thing clear. I love the schools; I know them and love the people in them. If I still taught there, I don't know what I'd do. Teaching is an enormously gratifying occupation. But exposing yourself unnecessarily to fatal disease is a losing proposition. If the schools can get these teachers on zoom effectively, it's a win-win, but it may take a while to work. And some kids, like my own, just need personal motivation, and aren't going to make it on zoom. I think there is hope here. We have the tools, we have the talent, we have the resources, and we have generations of knowing what is important for kids to learn. We are an inventive and innovative people, and the first step is getting in touch with what we can do to solve this problem and make education useful and safe and even fun for everyone. Some kids are going to need special attention, yes. We the people need to speak up about what we want, and save the public school system, as we know it, so it will work for everyone, and be safe.

Labels:

Wednesday, July 08, 2020

Annals of Public Education part III

I am outraged that a president would order everyone to go back to school, without providing the funds to make it possible. It's what they used to call an unfunded mandate, but it more strongly represents the gas chambers, in the sense that it's Russian roulette for older teachers, or older parents of school-aged children, like us. People are going to die here. The schools don't have a way to keep everyone safe, or deal with the inevitable infected student walking through the front door. By nature, schools are supposed to take these kids in during the day. When teachers, entire classrooms, and support staff are testing positive, what's supposed to happen?

I think there will be significant chaos, and it will take a few years before anyone gets a good education. I think that as half the parents turn to homeschooling, the quality of education may improve simply because of smaller class sizes, but the fear and disruption will play a heavy role and make it impossible for people to really concentrate. They are already worried about the gun situation. I think parents would have to be crazy to want to put their kids into a situation like that.

So I have two possible solutions. The first is the one-room schoolhouse model. We live way out in the country and would actually be better off if we didn't have to drive twenty miles in every day. There aren't many kids in this valley, but I'd be glad to take what there are, split duties with local parents, and start there. It's like homeschooling except you get the benefit of other parents' input and you as parents put significantly more time into it than we used to.

The other is to lean into online a little more. I could see grassroots online homeschooling actually working - people teach on zoom, kids learn to learn on zoom, the best teachers rise to the top, everything happens online. We could actually do it now, and lots of people would be way better off. We would have to start fast, though. Many people are way behind, thinking we will all just go back in a month. We will not all just go back in a month. We will not jump off a cliff either.

For many of us it's a life or death issue. I've got three still in school, but I'm 66 and not eager for them to bring home whatever the locals pick up from the Texas tourist trade. I think the schools do a pretty good job with the kids overall and I trust them in the big picture although I think their curriculum could probably be improved. But there is a definite value to having other good, responsible adults in their lives, so given the choice between my deciding what constitutes fifth grade math, and their deciding it, I think I'll stick with them. I'm busy. But if it's organized, I can help with the teaching. I think that parents in small groups have to start doing the organizing. We have to provide for our own. Those who think the government is just going to drop it in our laps, well, they used to, but they can't anymore. Not without threatening your life.

Labels:

Thursday, May 02, 2019

Annals of Public Education, part II

I am ready to admit defeat in my pursuit of full-time teaching in Middle School or High School, as I have now had two instances of failure. True, in both cases students knew I was a sub, and behaved accordingly, refusing to do work or take me seriously. It would perhaps be different if they'd known I was a permanent teacher, with real power over their lives, and the ability to start them off on my own conditions.

Nevertheless, the problem was, in a nutshell, that I was unable to be mean enough to set them on the right course, and, sensing the ability to take advantage of me, they did. There were 25 of them, and one of me, or in some cases, an assistant who was of no value in this regard. If as many as eight students, one-third, of a class like this chooses to make a racket, get out of their seat, throw a paper airplane, or whatever, the teacher's main choice is discipline. Send them to the office. Yell. Plead with them to shut up and do something they really don't want to do. I found myself spending too much time making everyone miserable, most of all myself.

I have two observations to make in order to keep myself from dwelling on my own failure (I may not be finished yet, but I AM 65 now, with social security, etc., and less and less motivation to start over or go full time). First is that class size is by itself the single most determinant factor I have noticed. In a class of 12, it's much easier to make people care; in a class of 25, I've found it virtually impossible. The school district would do better by and large to spend those assistants, by giving them their own group of about eight, and let them teach whatever they can, than by sticking them in there with some teacher who is doing his/her best to manage 25. Anything they could do to lower that number would help greatly.

Second is that by and large, "gifted" and "honors" do the same thing - separating out the better students - but this leaves the other classes weighed down with those who don't care. In my class I found, as I've said, maybe 8 or 9 out of 25 who truly didn't care. Another 5 or 6 were easily swayed if they thought they could get away with not caring, and that's where having a sub was crucial (with a sub, they were more likely to get away with not caring). But the absence of students who did care, I though, made a huge difference. In 6th grade math, we had no honors, and gifted was only a small percentage, so it wasn't a huge numerical balance issue in this last particular case. Earlier, though, I had a similar experience with a 9th grade algebra class, that also broke down into anarchy. Why? Many reasons. Classes should be orderly, with productive learning going on, and I couldn't sustain that. I thought they would just respond to the basic coolness of math; how wrong I was.

Labels:

Friday, February 15, 2019

Annals of Public Education

This particular sixth grade math class has had three, maybe four teachers, and they know I'm a sub. They're out for blood. They're drunk with power, knowing that if twenty two of them talk at once, what can I do? Keep them all in for lunch detention? Write all their parents?

The district has trouble finding math teachers, and it's not just subs when things fall apart early in the semester. It's right at the beginning, when someone is supposed to sign up for nine months of teaching these little monsters. The kids are actually quite innocent when they arrive, but they work themselves up into a frenzy of hormones when they sense weakness or lack of authority. And, they don't like math. They've had poor math education in the elementaries, and they know it's their weakness. They don't necessarily buy our pleas that it's important for their future. Or, they just get caught up in the fun of beating a sub.

"They're good kids," some people say, but the side I've seen of them hasn't been good. I've seen them using lotion as a weapon; taking little blocks out of a game and throwing them; crumpling up paper and throwing it at each other; leaving so much marker on a seat that other kids get their clothes marked; having to go to the restroom because their face is marked up, or their clothes, or there's lotion in their hair or hands, or any of various problems. They are certainly not doing their math homework. They don't know from averages. They can't answer simple questions. One can't read their handwriting. Their numbers don't make any sense, or, are copied from their friends, or both.

You may think all this is my fault, that perhaps I'm not stern enough for them. Yes, I guess that's true. I've been as mean as I could be, and it wasn't mean enough. I yelled and screamed, but they threw a little block at me when I turned my back. They stood on tables, and wrote on all the boards. They took whole boxes of kleenex out of the cupboards when I turned my back.

I'm too old for this, I might say. They don't think I'll make it, so they haven't given me the keys to the Synergy, or grading program. Without power over their grades, I'm just a sub - why should they listen? And, I have jury duty on Tuesday. Maybe I'll get a break from the whole ordeal.

Sixth grade math is not that hard. It forces them to think, though, and they've developed a resistance to that. They're too busy talking to think. They might be able to think at home, or maybe in a room with another teacher. At the moment, though, it's all-out war.

Labels: